WEKO3
アイテム
冷戦初期のアジア太平洋地域における多国間同盟システム：その構想と挫折の要因
https://hiroshima-cu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/65
https://hiroshima-cu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/6553dec6a4-6e96-47cd-b345-26e4831adf7a
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
HJIS24-25.pdf (888.5 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2023-02-20 | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | 冷戦初期のアジア太平洋地域における多国間同盟システム：その構想と挫折の要因 | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | Multilateral Alliances in the Asia-Pacific Region in the Early Cold War Period | |||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| その他（別言語等）のタイトル | ||||||||||||
| その他のタイトル | レイセン ショキ ノ アジア タイヘイヨウ チイキ ニオケル タコクカン ドウメイ システム : ソノ コウソウ ト ザセツ ノ ヨウイン | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 主題 | 国際関係論 | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 主題 | 国際安全保障 | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 主題 | 同盟理論 | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | journal article | |||||||||||
| 著者 |
西田, 竜也
× 西田, 竜也
× NISHIDA, Tatsuya
|
|||||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | In the Asia-Pacific region, various bilateral, trilateral and multilateral alliances were formed during the early Cold War period. In particular, the U.S.-Japan and the U.S.-Philippine alliances and the Australia-New Zealand-U. S. (ANZUS) pact evolved in 1951, and the U.S.-Republic of Korea (ROK) and the U.S.-Republic of China (ROC) alliances and the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO) advanced in 1953 and 1954. Compared to the construction of the single multilateral organization of NATO, these alliances are called hub-and-spokes alliances because the U.S. plays the core role by allying with all the allies while its allies do not necessarily ally with each other. This paper, however, focuses on various multilateral military alliances, which developed from 1949 to 1954 in the Asia-Pacific region, in an attempt to answer the question of why a single multilateral alliance like NATO did not develop in the Asia-Pacific region. Multilateral alliances such as ANZUS and SEATO were constructed in the region, but they are regarded qualitatively different from NATO, which this research tentatively calls an integrated alliance. This research, therefore, addresses questions about significant differences between NATO and multilateral alliances in the Asia Pacific. It also tries to explore why multilateral alliances in the region were not able to evolve into a NATO-type alliance or a multilateral integrated alliance. In particular, it is important to note that evidence suggests that multilateral alliances in the Asia-Pacific had the possibility of adopting collective defense arrangements, which NATO possesses. Considering these questions, the paper finally explores the theoretical implications of designing and forming single multilateral integrated alliances. |
|||||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
広島国際研究 en : Hiroshima Journal of International Studies 巻 24, p. 25-46, 発行日 2018-11-30 |
|||||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||||
| 出版者 | 広島市立大学国際学部 | |||||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 1341-3546 | |||||||||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN10485683 | |||||||||||
| フォーマット | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||||||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||||
