WEKO3
アイテム
ジョージ・ケナンと冷戦初期米国の核政策, 1945-1950
https://hiroshima-cu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/312
https://hiroshima-cu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/312facb9f9f-dea9-4806-9893-354d78c394f3
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
![]() |
|
Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2023-02-22 | |||||||||||
タイトル | ||||||||||||
タイトル | ジョージ・ケナンと冷戦初期米国の核政策, 1945-1950 | |||||||||||
タイトル | ||||||||||||
タイトル | George Kennan and His View of Nuclear Weapons, 1945-1950 | |||||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||||
言語 | ||||||||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題 | 核 | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題 | 核兵器 | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題 | カールトン・サヴェージ | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題 | ケナンの長文覚書 | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題 | 原子力国際管理 | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題 | 原爆 | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題 | 国家安全保障会議文書 | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題 | ジョージ・ケナン | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題 | 水爆 | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題 | 第一の選択 | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題 | 第二の選択 | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題 | ディーン・アチソン | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題 | ハリー・トルーマン | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題 | ポール・ニッツェ | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題 | ロバート・フーカー | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題 | 抑止 | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題 | 抑止力 | |||||||||||
資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||
資源タイプ | journal article | |||||||||||
著者 |
鈴木, 健人
× 鈴木, 健人
× SUZUKI, Taketo
|
|||||||||||
抄録 | ||||||||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||||
内容記述 | This article deals with George Kennan's view of nuclear weapons on the basis of his long memorandum of January 1950. Kennan was a prominent figure who developed the American "Containment" policy against the Soviet Union. He was also known for his critical attitude toward nuclear weapons. The reasons why Kennan, who was the architect of U.S. anti-Soviet policy, viewed nuclear weapons critically are highlighted in this article. Just after the end of World War II, Kennan thought that the "secret" of the A-bomb should not be opened to the Soviet Union. Kennan, who had complained about F.D. Roosevelt's wartime diplomacy, showed a very hard attitude against the old ally. At this stage, Kennan's view of nuclear weapons was very simple and was not so much different from the general public's attitude. But he developed his own view on A-bombs gradually. Particularly after serving as an instructor in the National War College, his view of the A-bomb was changed and became more sophisticated. Kennan thought that if the Soviet Union got the same kind of weapon, it would not necessarily mean that it would become aggressive. He accepted that nuclear weapons had a deterrent effect against any enemy. But, for him, the possession of A-bombs was a "sad duty" of the United States. In 1948, the U.S. government established its nuclear policy in National Security Coneil Document No. 30 (NSC30), and Kennan agreed with the policy reflected in the document. After 1948, U.S. security policy had increasingly relied on nuclear weapons. Successful Soviet detonation of an atomic bomb had served to accelerate the nuclearization of American military policy. Under the changing strategic environment, U.S. policy-makers expanded the nation's nuclear stockpile and began to develop the hydrogen bomb. Kennan, however, was highly skeptical of the A-bomb centered military policy. Kennan maintained that, because of their massive destructive power, nuclear weapons would bring lin1itless destruction of an enemy country. He held that the total destruction of the enemy was not necessarily essential in a war. War should be regarded as a means of attaining political ends with minimum destruction. Kennan asserted that war's business should not be to bring the total destruction of an enemy but rather to compel a change of the behavior and political thinking of the enemy. A-bombs, or H-bombs, were too destructive in the process of attaining political objectives. They should not be used as weapons in a war. Kennan was deeply worried that U.S. policy-makers tended to think that war with the Soviet Union, which would lead to World War III, was inevitable. To him, there was no necessity of a war between superpowers. Kennan thought that non-military factors were essential to win the cold war. Kennan wrote that nuclear weapons were a superfluous deterrent and they should be placed under international control. These were the focal points of his long memorandum of January 1950. However, the main current of American strategic thinking as reflected in National Security Council Document No. 68 (NSC-68) regarded nuclear weapons as the essential means of deterring the Soviet Union and, if necessary, of destroying it. |
|||||||||||
書誌情報 |
広島国際研究 en : Hiroshima Journal of International Studies 巻 1, p. 39-95, 発行日 1995-03-31 |
|||||||||||
出版者 | ||||||||||||
出版者 | 広島市立大学国際学部 | |||||||||||
ISSN | ||||||||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||||
収録物識別子 | 1341-3546 | |||||||||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||||
収録物識別子 | AN10485683 | |||||||||||
フォーマット | ||||||||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||||||||
著者版フラグ | ||||||||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |