WEKO3
アイテム
1998年与野党政権交代後の韓国の対外政策の変化 : 国家正統性・同盟のジレンマ・地政学認識の視点から
https://hiroshima-cu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/256
https://hiroshima-cu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/256b4f48609-f303-4469-8a77-5b542d450329
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
![]() |
|
Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2023-02-22 | |||||||||||
タイトル | ||||||||||||
タイトル | 1998年与野党政権交代後の韓国の対外政策の変化 : 国家正統性・同盟のジレンマ・地政学認識の視点から | |||||||||||
タイトル | ||||||||||||
タイトル | South Korea's Foreign Policy Transformation after the Power Change in 1998 : From the Point of View of State Legitimacy, Alliance Dilemma, and Geopolitics | |||||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||||
言語 | ||||||||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題 | 韓国 | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題 | 朝鮮半島 | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題 | 与野党政権交代 | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題 | 対外政策 | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題 | 北朝鮮政策 | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題 | 国家正統性 | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題 | 同盟のジレンマ | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題 | 地政学 | |||||||||||
資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||
資源タイプ | journal article | |||||||||||
著者 |
金, 栄鎬
× 金, 栄鎬
× KIM, Yeongho
|
|||||||||||
抄録 | ||||||||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||||
内容記述 | South Korea's Foreign Policy has been transformed since the peaceful power change between the ruling party and the opposition party in 1998 for the first time in South Korean History. Change is remarkable in policies toward North Korea, ROK-U.S. alliance, and multilateral regional cooperation. The North was regarded an illegitimate heretical group, never "a state", by the South for nearly half a century, and vice-versa. The South had long been claiming that it must be the "sole legitimate state" over the entire Korean Peninsula. The Kim Dae-Jung Government and after, however, placed the North at not "a heretical, illegitimate group" but "the counterpart" for coexistence, cooperation, and future reunification. The South was heavily dependent on the U.S. for its security and political economic support against a threat from the North. Hence, the South suffered from "abandonment" of alliance dilemma. However, the Roe Moo-Hyun Government is anxious about "entrapment" of alliance dilemma. Both the Kim and the Roe Government are common in the preference of co-alition, co-existence, and cooperation with the North. The former, on the one hand, coped with East Asian regional economic cooperation, in which the North can be integrated. The latter, on the other hand, prefers Northeast Asian security cooperation, in which the U.S.power can be embedded and, moreover, the South will be a kind of balancer as a non-hegemonic state. |
|||||||||||
書誌情報 |
広島国際研究 en : Hiroshima Journal of International Studies 巻 12, p. 1-27, 発行日 2006-11-30 |
|||||||||||
出版者 | ||||||||||||
出版者 | 広島市立大学国際学部 | |||||||||||
ISSN | ||||||||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||||
収録物識別子 | 1341-3546 | |||||||||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||||
収録物識別子 | AN10485683 | |||||||||||
フォーマット | ||||||||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||||||||
著者版フラグ | ||||||||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |