WEKO3
アイテム
The Arms Trade Treaty : Pursuit for the Effective Control of Arms Transfer
https://hiroshima-cu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/1822
https://hiroshima-cu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/182298dfabb7-7767-441c-97cf-19a71455d37f
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
JCSL20(2)_301.pdf (289.0 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2023-03-07 | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | The Arms Trade Treaty : Pursuit for the Effective Control of Arms Transfer | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | journal article | |||||||||||
| 著者 |
FUKUI, Yasuhito
× FUKUI, Yasuhito
× 福井, 康人
|
|||||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | The General Assembly of the United Nations (UNGA) adopted the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) on 2 April 2013, which entered into force on 24 December 2014. The process towards the adoption of the ATT draws the attention of the international disarmament community because the negotiation of the ATT failed to agree on the treaty text twice at diplomatic conferences, due to its rigid consensus rule before the adoption of the ATT by vote in the UNGA. This study first describes the ATT negotiation as an example of international law-making process, especially from three cardinal viewpoints: (i) the decision-making by consensus stipulated in its rules of procedure; (ii) the role of the UNGA in the adoption of the ATT; and (iii) the contribution of the NGOs to the treaty negotiation. This article further examines the result of the negotiation, the agreed text of the ATT, focusing on the act transfer, which is the key concept of the ATT. This analysis includes the comparative studies of the precedents set by other disarmament treaties and also other issues related to the act of transfer in the ATT. One of the interesting issues is the language of safeguards contained in the clause for the act of transfer, which is also regarded as a loophole along with the ambiguity in the ATT. Consequently, this article concludes that the language of safeguards and the ambiguity in the ATT are ‘necessary evils’ for the universalisation of the ATT and it also proposes possible solutions in the quest for effective control of arms transfer through the ATT. | |||||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
Journal of conflict & security law 巻 20, 号 2, p. 301-321, 発行日 2015-04-09 |
|||||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||||
| 出版者 | Oxford University Press | |||||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 14677962|14677954 | |||||||||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA12104927|AA11561275 | |||||||||||
| DOI | ||||||||||||
| 関連タイプ | isVersionOf | |||||||||||
| 識別子タイプ | DOI | |||||||||||
| 関連識別子 | info:doi/https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krv003 | |||||||||||
| 権利 | ||||||||||||
| 権利情報 | © Oxford University Press 2015; all rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com | |||||||||||
| 他の資源との関係 | ||||||||||||
| 関連名称 | https://academic.oup.com/jcsl/article/20/2/301/842061 | |||||||||||
| フォーマット | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||||||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | AM | |||||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa | |||||||||||
